Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  139 / 204 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 139 / 204 Next Page
Page Background

Rothschild & Co | Annual Report 2017   

137

1. Overview

4. Financial statements

3.

Management report

2. Business review

Unimpaired loans extended in this manner are not categorised as either past due or as renegotiated. As at 31 December 2017 the cumulative value of all

loans within this category was €3.1 million (31 March 2017: €20.1 million). All of these loans were property loans. There are also some loans which are

overdue, but not impaired, pending an extension of maturity. As at 31 December 2017, these amounted to €12.9 million (31 March 2017: €18.3 million).

Some loans were renegotiated on substantially different terms than before. Typically these loans will include revised covenants and higher margins to

reflect higher credit risk as well as having extended maturities. If these loans had not been renegotiated, they would have been deemed to have been

impaired. As at 31 December 2017, the carrying value of all loans renegotiated was €0.6 million (31 March 2017: €2.1 million).

3 Collateral

The Group holds collateral against loans to customers, as substantially all third party commercial lending is secured. The majority of collateral is in the form

of charges over property assets, or over marketable securities (Lombard lending). There is a realistic possibility, if necessary, of both taking possession of,

and realising, the collateral.

Unimpaired loans (categories 1 to 3) are usually covered by collateral. For category 1, 2 and 3 loans the level of collateral at exit is expected to be sufficient

to cover the balance sheet exposure. Where a loan is deemed to be impaired (categories 4 and 5), the level of the impairment charge is primarily driven by

any expected shortfall in the collateral value, though it is also influenced by the ability of the borrower to service the debt.

Collateral is valued independently at the time the loan is made and periodically thereafter on a rolling basis. Management is able to roll forward a valuation

for reporting purposes via a combination of specific knowledge of the collateral and the application of general indices.

The table below gives an estimate of the fair value of collateral held by the Group as security against its loans to customers that are individually impaired

and past due but not impaired.

In millions of euro

31/12/2017

31/03/2017

Past due but

not impaired

Individually

impaired

Past due but

not impaired

Individually

impaired

Tangible assets collateral

12.9

81.0

18.5

89.6

Financial assets collateral

31.0

2.1

26.4

TOTAL

12.9

112.0

20.6

116.0

Gross value of loans

12.9

144.3

18.3

154.2

Impairment

n/a

(57.1)

n/a

(55.3)

Net value of loans

12.9

87.2

18.3

98.9

4 Further credit risk analysis

The tables below show an analysis of credit risk by location and by sector as at 31 December 2017 and 31 March 2017.

A) CREDIT RISK BY LOCATION

Location for loans and advances is measured by reference to the location of the borrower. Debt securities are recorded based on the location of the issuer

of the security.

In millions of euro

France Switzerland

UK and

Channel

Islands

Rest of

Europe

Americas Australia

and Asia

Other 31/12/2017

Cash and amounts due from central banks

1,206.9 2,658.6

3.4

– 3,868.9

Financial assets at fair value through profit

or loss 

(1)

18.9

9.3

5.2

15.5

0.5

0.7

0.1

50.2

Loans and advances to banks

657.5

50.9 342.8 328.6 313.0

22.8

14.6

1,730.2

Loans and advances to customers

1,514.9 115.9 795.2 264.9 158.8

78.6

61.6 2,989.9

Available-for-sale debt securities

306.3

– 147.8 422.2 100.0

9.4

1.0

986.7

Other financial assets

138.8

25.5

62.5 102.4

63.3

24.2

9.7

426.4

Subtotal assets

3,843.3 2,860.2 1,353.5 1,137.0 635.6 135.7

87.0 10,052.3

Commitments and guarantees

321.3

48.5

82.5

98.1

0.1

11.4

2.0

563.9

TOTAL

4,164.6 2,908.7 1,436.0 1,235.1 635.7 147.1

89.0 10,616.2

(1) Excluding equity.